Bloodseeker - viable melee mid options, and you will understand what I am talking about. These heroes tend to have a comparable, if not superior gank potential. Bloodseeker, viable, understand, superior gang. What is this?
Even though I agree that playing BloodSeeker in a competitive environment as a mid hero is very suboptimal, in a 4.1k MMR and lower he does wonders. Moreover, I would still argue that it is much easier to mid BloodSeeker than to mid Pudge.
link ded... new one: http://dotabuff.com/blog/2014-01-20-much-hook-very-skill-such-wow
Yeah, we are working on it. While it is still in the works I have to use forum to promote it.
Dude if I find u in a game, on my team, picking that 35% winrate Invoker of yours then i should start posting about how useless is that hero?!? I see from time to time people hating on X hero and crying about how OP is the Y hero ENOUGH ALREADY. If u see a pro player picking 10/10 games Pudge and owning u love it but when u play casual games and see pudge pick u rage and cry 1 min before game even starts! Same crap i see with Meepo and as i can see from your stats its not easy for u to play skill based heroes, thats not bad and im not trolling you, ex. cant play Chen and will never do BUT i cant say he is useless.
We are not pros here but casual players, with ur logic we should only pick 9-10 players that can rush towers cause thats the goal of the game correct? And any other hero should be considered unreliable right?..
Anyway just try one time to offlane pudge-omni with a friend and see if the enemy carry farms anything, u dont even need heal from omni, just repel and slow.
Bottom line is stop hating Heroes, players make them what they are
Будь ласка, увійдіть до системи для написання коментарів.
Today I will be discussing Pudge - the most popular hero in the world of Dota 2!
So, here is the link: Pudge, the Butcher